{"id":17,"date":"2004-10-31T10:56:46","date_gmt":"2004-10-31T15:56:46","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.escamoteurettes.com\/blog\/?p=17"},"modified":"2004-11-01T12:10:54","modified_gmt":"2004-11-01T17:10:54","slug":"the-japanese-james-bond","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.escamoteurettes.com\/blog\/2004\/10\/31\/the-japanese-james-bond\/","title":{"rendered":"Maven. Max Maven."},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Shameful. Just shameful.<\/p>\n<p>In a conversation with a close friend not so long ago, I found out he isn&#8217;t a James Bond fan. (For the more reasonable among you, I&#8217;ll give you a moment to settle down and recover from the expected, and perfectly understandable hyperventilating.)<\/p>\n<p>Now, to be clear, it&#8217;s not that he&#8217;s specifically not a fan of the prissy <em>Roger Moore James Bond<\/em>; the regrettably forgettable <em>George Lazenby James Bond<\/em>; the wildly popular &#8212; if not un-Flemingesque &#8212; <em>Sean Connery James Bond<\/em>; the dead-on, this-is-who-I-believe-God-Himself-would-have-picked-to-play-James Bond <em>Timothy Dalton James Bond<\/em>; or the Roger Moore-extra <em>Pierce Brosnan James Bond<\/em>. I could even overlook the overlooked reference to the <em>Barry Nelson James Bond<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>But he doesn&#8217;t like James Bond <em><a target='_blank' href=\"http:\/\/dictionary.reference.com\/search?q=in%20toto\">in toto<\/a>.<\/em> (Not that I have any strong opinions on the movies and the individual actors, you understand.)<\/p>\n<p>Naturally, I still consider him a friend. I believe there&#8217;s still time to save his soul.<\/p>\n<p>To my point: while several actors and producers have contributed, collectively we have a character, created by Ian Fleming, named <em>James Bond<\/em>. That character is clearly identifiable and, in the world of entertainment, carries a great degree of stature, substance and marketability.<\/p>\n<p>This is not to say there haven&#8217;t been <a target='_blank' href=\"http:\/\/dictionary.reference.com\/search?q=spoof\">spoofs<\/a> of the character. The second treatment of <em><a target='_blank' href=\"http:\/\/www.imdb.com\/title\/tt0061452\/plotsummary\">Casino Royale<\/a><\/em> &#8212; the comedy film version &#8212; featured a performance by the brilliant <a target='_blank' href=\"http:\/\/www.imdb.com\/name\/nm0000634\/\">Peter Sellers<\/a>. The Austin Powers series is another example, though clearly aimed at the <em><a target='_blank' href=\"http:\/\/www.imdb.com\/title\/tt0109686\/\">Dumb and Dumber<\/a><\/em> crowd. But these can be considered legitimate entities.<\/p>\n<p>I won&#8217;t go into naming them, but there have been versions of the <em>James Bond<\/em> character &#8212; overt copies &#8212; that are just shameful to watch. Relatively speaking, there aren&#8217;t many Ian Flemings &#8212; or Tom Clanceys or Patricia Cornwells or Sue Graftons or Jonathan Kellermans and other fiction writers &#8212; in this world to create the James Bonds or Kay Scarpettas or Kinsey Millhones or Alex Delawares and other memorable, engaging fictional characters. So, those who cannot create, appropriate and, as a result, can &#8212; at best &#8212; only present a shell of a character without the substance.<\/p>\n<p>In a <a target='_blank' href=\"http:\/\/www.themagiccafe.com\/forums\/viewtopic.php?topic=88632&#038;forum=15&#038;start=0\">recent thread on The Magic Cafe<\/a>, there was discussion of one of Ted Lesley&#8217;s offerings. The primary issue got sidetracked as a direct result of a Cafe member posting a link to his personal web site. I clicked the link and the word &#8220;shameful&#8221; tumbled out of my mouth. The more I clicked, the more I shook my head in amazement &#8212; and not the kind we, as mystery performers, hope to engender in our audiences. (At least, not deliberately. I hope.)<\/p>\n<p>To take you along with me, let us first visit the web site of well-known Max Maven:<\/p>\n<p><a target='_blank' href=\"http:\/\/www.maxmaven.com\/\">http:\/\/www.maxmaven.com<\/a><\/p>\n<p>That is a distinct, unique look &#8212; a character &#8212; deliberately created and built over many, many years and thousands of performances. Both in and out of our little world of magic and mentalism, it carries a great degree of stature, substance and marketability.<\/p>\n<p>Now, let us visit the web site of lesser known Deddy Corbuzier:<\/p>\n<p><a target='_blank' href=\"http:\/\/www.deddy-corbuzier.com\/\">http:\/\/www.deddy-corbuzier.com\/<\/a><\/p>\n<p>This isn&#8217;t <em>Peter Sellers<\/em> territory. This isn&#8217;t even <em>Austin Powers<\/em> territory.  This is in a category all to itself, although &#8212; sadly &#8212; not a small, sparsely inhabited one. This falls into the category of intellectual property theft and gross disrespect.<\/p>\n<p>And it&#8217;s not, as young Corbuzier suggests, coincidence. When I viewed the video of his &#8220;<a target='_blank' href=\"http:\/\/homepage.mac.com\/corbuzier\/iMovieTheater9.html\">Jakarta Blindfold Drive 2004<\/a>&#8221; I see a person who not only appropriated a look clearly identified with Max Maven (the widow&#8217;s peak and eye makeup, to start with) but I see attempts at the same clothing, the same gestures, the same overall performing persona. Corbuzier even sports a long, braided ponytail, for pity&#8217;s sake. It&#8217;s embarrasingly shameful behavior.<\/p>\n<p>His reason for stealing Max&#8217;s image? Does it really matter?<\/p>\n<p>Corbuzier considers himself a professional, a self-given appellation he&#8217;s only too quick to remind you of. But would a <em>true professional<\/em> behave in such a manner?<\/p>\n<p>The only thing that might be more appropriate than Corbuzier ceasing to use the word <em>professional<\/em> would be for him to stop using Max Maven&#8217;s look and channeling Max&#8217;s performing persona. That would be a good start.<\/p>\n<p>With quite a bit of hard work and effort, there might even be something left worth watching.<\/p>\n<p>EDITED 11\/1\/2004: I changed &#8220;Roger Moore-lite&#8221; to &#8220;Roger Moore-extra&#8221; because of something Andrew W. mentioned in his comment. I think he&#8217;s right, I was a bit harsh. Brosnan is, well, <em>manlier<\/em> than Moore, but still not Dalton. Noted and corrected.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Shameful. Just shameful. In a conversation with a close friend not so long ago, I found out he isn&#8217;t a James Bond fan. (For the more reasonable among you, I&#8217;ll give you a moment to settle down and recover from the expected, and perfectly understandable hyperventilating.) Now, to be clear, it&#8217;s not that he&#8217;s specifically <a class=\"read-more\" href=\"http:\/\/www.escamoteurettes.com\/blog\/2004\/10\/31\/the-japanese-james-bond\/\">[&hellip;]<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.escamoteurettes.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.escamoteurettes.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.escamoteurettes.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.escamoteurettes.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.escamoteurettes.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=17"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/www.escamoteurettes.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.escamoteurettes.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=17"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.escamoteurettes.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=17"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.escamoteurettes.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=17"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}